"We have done this because we love liberty and hate authority." – Voltairine de Cleyre
James Tuttle
I am a Left-Libertarian Market Anarchist, Co-Editor of the Left-Libertarian Journal ALLiance and a dues paying Fellow Worker of the Industrial Workers of the World. I believe that justice and fairness share a dialectical relationship and that both can find full expression within a social context without contradiction or compromise. I believe in an individualistic, supply sided, virtue ethic that is grounded in Aristotelian categories. I regard the principle of non-aggression as hollow and brittle if it is not dialectically united to a principle of non-oppression. My banner is the black flag and across its uncorrupted field you will discover the watchwords: Liberty, Equality, and Solidarity! And I really like cats.
Homepage: http://www.alliancejournal.net
Posts by James Tuttle
Stateless U. and You.
Jan 28th
Stateless University Registration begins January 16th for its first term of 2011.
I would like to take this opportunity to talk about what Stateless U. can do for you and this plucky movement of ours.
The Stateless U., Introduction to Anarchism, takes great pride in being able to offering a varied and versatile introduction to anarchist theory and practice. Our principle goals: to familiarize the student with the basic political-economic-ethical vocabulary of anarchist theory, build up your enthusiasm for and understanding of how a stateless society would/could work, and prepare you for Brad Spangler’s Law and Order in a Stateless Society.
But this is all pretty standard stuff, so what? What makes Stateless University different?
What makes Stateless U. different and interesting is its long-run objective: to create a network of alumni, versed in anarchism generally and Agorism specifically, that can begin dispute resolution and arbitration for Agorist agents and agencies. This alumni network is just one infrastructural step in the creation and maintenance of a counter-economy. (Other possible steps would be the creation of insurance and security networks to further reduce the risk of total loss in the event of State disruption and confiscation.)
Counter-Economics is an abbreviation for Counter-Establishment-Economics and, as Samuel Edward Konkin III points out, it was formed the same way as Counter-Establishment-Culture (Counter-Culture). Both are not the repudiation of culture or economy, per say, but the rejection of the established/entrenched culture and economy. I think this is an important connection between both Counter-Establishment movements and points to an area of mutual support. The Counter-Economy can support and build the efforts of a Counter-Culture; while the Counter-Culture can support and build the efforts of a Counter-Economy.
Stateless University also has plans for offering more scholarships, expanding our methods of communications, improving our teaching techniques, creating essay contests with prizes and creating Campus Liberation outreach materials.
Please join our Alumni Network and invite your friends to take a look. We need your feedback to improve and expand this project; no critique is too small for liberty.
ALL the best.
Stateless University, Registration Begins Tomorrow.
Jan 15th
Stateless University Registration begins January 16th for its first term of 2011.
I would like to offer the prospective “student” a taste-test of some of the issues and questions that we will wrestle with in Stateless University’s Bravo Section.
1. According to Karl Hess’ Anarchism without Hyphens, “Anarchism is not normative. It does not say how to be free. It says only that freedom, liberty, can exist.”
Do you agree with Hess’ position on “anarchism” and what distinction, if any, can be made between the “anarchist” and the “anarchism?”
2. According to Karl Hess’ the Left/Right spectrum, the traditional “left/right spectrum” was a tool for analyzing regimes, policies and allies with regard to their relative tendencies towards centralized or de-centralized power.
Do you think this is a helpful tool for analysis, “relative tendencies towards centralized or de-centralized power”? If not, then what could be used in its place for evaluating “regimes, policies and allies?”
3. In “Big Business and the Rise of American Statism” Roy Childs describes the paradigmatic nature of historiography.
How does this help us explain the modern, inaccurate description of how State-Capitalism accumulates and condenses resources; and can it help us understand why free-market principles and dynamics are misdiagnosed and misapplied as the contributing factor to the economy we experience today?
4. Less Antman takes inventory of the peaks and valleys of the perennial debate on property theory. And he dares to hint at the question, “Is property valued for ‘peace’ or ‘status;’ are property norms consumer goods or producers goods?”
What do you think? Are property norms consumer goods or producer goods?
5. Melanie “Broadsnark” Pinkert offers a sober, yet needed, revaluation of resistance culture and its effectiveness.
If Protest is made illegal and virtually impossible, then what can we do to influence the dominate culture in any meaningful way?
6. In this interview (start @ 28:30), Derrick Jensen, the everything man, describes the terrifying fact that in most military organizations it is only 2% of the members that actively participate in violence. The vast, 98%, majority of the organization is mission support. If we, also, take into consideration institutional maintenance, then we would have to include every member of adjacent populations that support violent institutions by respecting or regarding its very existence as legitimate.
Add the former realization to the accelerating rate that natural resources, captial and wealth are being systematically and permanently destroyed by the “Political Class.” Could these observations be regarded as a compelling argument for “everything,” by way of tactics and strategy, to be reexamined?
ALL the best.
Bradley Manning and the UCMJ Dungeon.
Jan 7th

So, what’s the status of Bradley Manning, legally and morally? What are our “leaders” doing to this boy and how does the American subject population feel about it? Is Bradley America’s equivalent of Omelas’ sacrificial child? Or a hero for the ages; a Smedley Butler or Daniel Ellsberg for the opening decade of the 21st century?
We’ve all heard it before, “Support the Troops, because they defend our freedoms.” But do they? When I was in the U.S. Army I don’t remember any stalwart or teary moments at freedom’s defense. Typical day: coffee and calisthenics in the morning; bureaucracy and cigarettes in the afternoon; and boredom and beer in the evening. There were no discussions of what “freedom” means or what it looks and feels like. It was a job, with a dangerous task and a boss that could legally make your life a living hell… oh and you can’t quit. Bradley Manning is experiencing the legal side of this living hell. A circle of hell populated by indifferent robots of the military, semi-corporate bureaucrat structure. Lost behind walls of paperwork in a UCMJ dungeon. Why!?!
“If there’s a soldier anywhere in the world who’s fought and suffered for my freedom, it’s Pfc. Bradley Manning,” says C4SS researcher Kevin Carson. “Every war since [the revolution] … has been for nothing but to uphold a system of power, and to make the rich folks even richer.” Kevin concludes:
“So if you’re one of the authoritarian state-worshipers, one of the groveling sycophants of power, who are cheering on Manning’s punishment and calling for even harsher treatment, all I can say is that you’d probably have been there at the crucifixion urging Pontius Pilate to lay the lashes on a little harder. You’d have told the Nazis where Anne Frank was hiding. You’re unworthy of the freedoms which so many heroes and martyrs throughout history — heroes like Bradley Manning — have fought to give you.”
Don’t let Bradley Manning get lost in the UCMJ dudgeon; Free Bradley Manning!
Julian Assange’s Fully Informed Jury
Dec 12th
The ever productive George Donnelly has put together a possible Fully Informed Jury Association outreach project in support of WikiLeak‘s co-founder Julian Assange.
Julian Assange’s Fully Informed Jury!
If Julian Assange is extradited to the US, he will face a kangaroo court. Our job is to educate every potential member of his jury about their right to judge the law as well as the facts of a case.
IOW, jury members can decide that – even though the state may prove Assange did something it doesn’t like – the law is wrong or there are extenuating circumstances that justify rendering a not guilty verdict.
Our job is to educate jurors about this. We don’t want a conviction or long sentence for someone like Assange. We can hardly afford further chilling of the human right of free speech.
DO NOT take this pledge lightly. It may require travel, hardship, significant cost and time. If you pledge and then don’t honor it, your reputation WILL suffer.
I, along with the C4SS Director, Brad Spangler, have pledged to participate in this event. Road Trip! If you need a ride, just let me know and we will pick you up.
ALL the best!
On Wage Slavery.
Dec 8th
Brad Spangler, Director of the Center for a Stateless Society, published this little gem under Talking Points: Wage Slavery: The Short Version.
From the body of the post:
The state acts to involuntarily transfer wealth from the productive class to a political class elite, thereby monopolizing/cartelizing capital. Additionally, the state forcibly cuts off opportunities for economic self-sufficiency. The result is that people are forcibly denied any alternative but to sell labor artificially cheaply in a buyer’s market, where the buyers are a political class plutocracy gorged on stolen loot and enjoying economic influence they are not rightly due.
From the comments section by the ever brilliant Neverfox:
There is also another way that I’ve discussed before: a situation where people are treated, through the wage relation, as a thing without responsibility for its actions, i.e. a legal non-person in some regard (though not necessarily every regard, which is why I don’t think it’s sufficient to point to some ways that they are treated as a legal person, e.g. by pointing out that they can voluntarily disassociate without fear of reprisal). The burden, I think, is on the capitalist (in the ideological sense, not the purely descriptive sense of someone who owns capital) to explain, other than by duration, why renting someone by the hour is substantively different from buying someone for a lifetime, even when it’s voluntary, if both happen to require that the worker give up something they have no right to give up, i.e. some aspect of their legal standing as a person.
Also checkout the C4SS Market Anarchism FAQ lovingly looked after by Ross Kenyon:
However, market forces naturally undermine exploitation. Market Anarchists tend to see economic domination of working people as the product of statism and not the market. In a free society without Benjamin Tucker’s Four Monopolies over land, currency, patents, and tariffs, the economic dependency proletarians have upon capitalists is virtually destroyed. Capitalism, in the sense of an unjust status quo characterized by state-driven monopolization of capital, depends upon a captive labor force whose better options are destroyed or precluded by state intervention in the market on behalf of a parasitic elite.
As a Wobbly I am committed to the end of the Wage System. I believe liberty, ethics and market forces, along with direct action, radical democracy, community building, P6 committed cooperatives and fighting unions will get us to that end. In a sense, I believe the whole universe is on our side. State-Capital is an upside down pyramid only held in place by violence, blood, oppression and silence. It will come down, it must come down. The only questions left are, “when?” And, ”how much more do we tolerate?”
As Kevin Carson has so eloquently put it in The Iron Fist Behind the Invisible Hand:
“The current structure of capital ownership and organization of production in our so-called “market” economy, reflects coercive state intervention prior to and extraneous to the market. From the outset of the industrial revolution, what is nostalgically called “laissez-faire” was in fact a system of continuing state intervention to subsidize accumulation, guarantee privilege, and maintain work discipline.”

